 |
The practical question, then,
is what to do with the children. Tolerate them at home we will not. Let them run loose in
the streets we dare not until our streets become safe places for children, which, to our
utter shame, they are not at present, though they can hardly be worse than some homes and
some schools.
The grotesque difficulty of making even a beginning was brought home to
me in the little village in Hertfordshire where I write these lines by the lady of the
manor, who asked me very properly what I was going to do for the village school. I did not
know what to reply. As the school kept the children quiet during my working hours, I did
not for the sake of my own personal convenience want to blow it up with dynamite as I
should like to blow up most schools. So I asked for guidance. "You ought to give a
prize," said the lady. I asked if there was a prize for good conduct. As I expected,
there was: one for the best-behaved boy and another for the best-behaved girl. On
reflection I offered a handsome prize for the worst-behaved boy and girl on condition that
a record should be kept of their subsequent careers and compared with the records of the
best-behaved, in order to ascertain whether the school criterion of good conduct was valid
out of school. My offer was refused because it would not have had the effect of
encouraging the children to give as little trouble as possible, which is of course the
real object of all conduct prizes in schools.
I must not pretend, then, that I have a system ready to replace all the
other systems. Obstructing the way of the proper organization of childhood, as of
everything else, lies our ridiculous misdistribution of the national income, with its
accompanying class distinctions and imposition of snobbery on children as a necessary part
of their social training. The result of our economic folly is that we are a nation of
undesirable acquaintances; and the first object of all our institutions for children is
segregation. If, for example, our children were set free to roam and play about as they
pleased, they would have to be policed; and the first duty of the police in a State like
ours would be to see that every child wore a badge indicating its class in society, and
that every child seen speaking to another child with a lower-class badge, or any child
wearing a higher badge than that allotted to it by, say, the College of Heralds, should
immediately be skinned alive with a birch rod. It might even be insisted that girls with
high-class badges should be attended by footmen, grooms, or even military escorts. In
short, there is hardly any limit to the follies with which our Commercialism would infect
any system that it would tolerate at all. But something like a change of heart is still
possible; and since all the evils of snobbery and segregation are rampant in our schools
at present we may as well make the best as the worst of them. |
 |